According to @OnchainLens, a newly created wallet withdrew 3,956 ZEC (about $1.55 million) from Binance 6 hours before the post, with the address and transfer visible on Arkham’s explorer at intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/t1cfDDjxcoFmkmjxSQfQkMgiR2wsN7ou4T9. According to @OnchainLens, the on-chain alert specifically identifies a single outbound exchange outflow of 3,956 ZEC from Binance to a new external address, supported by the Arkham link provided in the post.

According to @lookonchain, wallet bc1q57 withdrew 1,320 BTC (about $119.6M) from Binance roughly two hours ago. The Arkham Intelligence explorer link shared by @lookonchain shows the address receiving 1,320 BTC, confirming the transfer size and recent timing, according to Arkham Intelligence. Using the figures reported by @lookonchain, the move implies an approximate transfer price near $90.6k per BTC, offering a reference point for tracking the whale’s cost basis, per @lookonchain. Traders frequently monitor sustained exchange outflows as indications of reduced immediate sell-side liquidity and potential accumulation, according to Glassnode and CryptoQuant research. For trade execution and risk management, monitor BTC exchange netflow, order book depth, and funding rates to confirm whether outflows persist and how price reacts, per Glassnode and CryptoQuant.

According to @EmberCN, after ETH reclaimed 3,000 USD, a whale who borrowed 5,000 ETH to short about one month ago closed the position by withdrawing 4,830 ETH, valued around 14.75 million USD, from Binance to repay on-chain. According to @EmberCN, the short was initiated on December 5 at an ETH price of 3,132 USD and was covered today at approximately 3,054 USD. According to @EmberCN, the trade generated an estimated profit of about 390,000 USD and the source shared the on-chain repayment address.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, wallet 0x94d3735543ecb3d339064151118644501c933814 opened an ETH short on Hyperliquid and now holds 36,281.29 ETH short (~$106M) at a $2,920.21 entry with an unrealized loss of ~$0.521M, ranking as a Top 2 ETH short on the venue. Source: X post by @ai_9684xtpa https://x.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/2005824307763761375 and Hyperbot dashboard https://hyperbot.network/trader/0x94d3735543ecb3d339064151118644501c933814. According to @ai_9684xtpa, the same address also holds $48.18M in BTC shorts and $13.43M in SOL shorts, with take-profit bands set at BTC $86,250–$86,800, ETH $2,700–$2,900, and SOL $121–$131.76. Source: X post by @ai_9684xtpa https://x.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/2005824307763761375 and Hyperbot dashboard https://hyperbot.network/trader/0x94d3735543ecb3d339064151118644501c933814. According to @ai_9684xtpa, the trader’s reported cumulative profit over the past week totals $6.22M. Source: X post by @ai_9684xtpa https://x.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/2005824307763761375. According to @ai_9684xtpa, they also report a single-day increase of 46,036.72 ETH in tracked accumulation activity. Source: X post by @ai_9684xtpa https://x.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/2005824307763761375. According to @ai_9684xtpa and on-chain data, Arkham Intel shows the entity labeled Trend Research withdrew 13,462 ETH (~$39.31M) from Binance, updating on-chain holdings to 626,071 ETH (> $1.83B) with an average cost of about $3,105.5 and an unrealized loss near $110M. Source: Arkham Intel address 0x8FDC74baD4AA20904a362D4b69434A0Cf4d97f43 https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x8FDC74baD4AA20904a362D4b69434A0Cf4d97f43 and X post by @ai_9684xtpa https://x.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/2005824307763761375. According to @ai_9684xtpa, these take-profit levels explicitly define the trader’s targeted exit zones for BTC, ETH, and SOL perps. Source: X post by @ai_9684xtpa https://x.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/2005824307763761375.

According to @EmberCN, a whale or institution lost 50 million USDT after sending funds to a look-alike address created via an address-poisoning scam (source: @EmberCN). According to the same source, the wallet withdrew 50 million USDT from Binance roughly 10 hours earlier and first sent a 50 USDT test to the intended recipient (source: @EmberCN). According to @EmberCN, the attacker generated an address sharing the same first and last three characters and sent a small 0.005 transaction so the poisoned address appeared in the victim’s recent history, leading the victim to copy it and transfer the full amount (source: @EmberCN). According to the source, traders should not copy addresses from recent transactions and should verify the entire address string, as a test transfer alone did not prevent this loss (source: @EmberCN).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, wallet 0xFB3BF33Ba8E5d08D87B0db0e46952144DF822833 withdrew 12.43M ASTER from Binance about 9 hours ago, valued at $13.04M at a stated withdrawal price of $0.9705; source: @ai_9684xtpa post on Dec 10, 2025, and Arkham Intelligence address page intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0xFB3BF33Ba8E5d08D87B0db0e46952144DF822833. The same address was previously reported to have accumulated roughly $133M in ASTER around three months earlier; source: @ai_9684xtpa. For trading context, the reported $0.9705 level offers a near-term reference, and subsequent flows from this address can be monitored on Arkham Intelligence to gauge exchange outflow activity; source: @ai_9684xtpa and intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0xFB3BF33Ba8E5d08D87B0db0e46952144DF822833.

According to @OnchainLens, a dormant BTC whale withdrew 171 BTC worth approximately $15.79 million from Binance to external address 34qy7UDjMHxWdZAh9FMcZQ5gNXM3JYuygN on Dec 3, 2025, based on Nansen on-chain data (source: Onchain Lens on X; Nansen data). This transaction constitutes an exchange outflow of 171 BTC from Binance to the cited external address, immediately reducing BTC held on-exchange by that amount at the time of movement (source: Onchain Lens on X; Nansen data).

According to Lookonchain, whale address bc1ql5 sold 500 BTC about 9 hours ago for $45.37 million, realizing a loss exceeding $10.5 million, based on on-chain tracking of the transaction, source: Lookonchain. The same address withdrew 500 BTC from Binance on Oct 14 at an implied purchase price of $111,899 per BTC totaling $55.95 million, corroborated by the Arkham Intelligence Explorer address record, source: Lookonchain; source: Arkham Intelligence Explorer. BTC later fell below $81,000 after that withdrawal, negating the attempted buy-the-dip entry, source: Lookonchain. For trading context, the $81,000 print and the $111,899 cost basis are explicit price references from the reported flow and the address history can be monitored on Arkham Intelligence for further movements, source: Lookonchain; source: Arkham Intelligence Explorer.

According to Onchain Lens, a whale withdrew 25.99M WLFI worth $4.18M from Binance and shared the wallet address 0xd947E0D946e285f004958bfD3416D0357B0E8784 (source: Onchain Lens on X, Nov 25, 2025). According to Onchain Lens, the wallet now holds 73.16M WLFI valued at $11.7M (source: Onchain Lens on X, Nov 25, 2025). According to figures reported by Onchain Lens, the implied per‑token value is approximately $0.161 for the withdrawn batch and about $0.160 for the current holdings (source: Onchain Lens on X, Nov 25, 2025).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, a newly active address 0xB042F1E0DCcE0235bC8740b8F6AAa50cFB82Bd98 accumulated 2,500 ETH about two hours prior via a withdrawal from Binance at an average price of $3,035.56, totaling roughly $7.588 million; source: @ai_9684xtpa on X. The post provides the wallet for verification through Arkham Intelligence’s explorer, enabling traders to track subsequent movements of these funds; source: @ai_9684xtpa on X and Arkham Intelligence explorer. On-chain participants often monitor large exchange outflows to new wallets for short-term flow signals and potential changes in available sell-side liquidity; source: CryptoQuant insights on exchange reserves and on-chain flows.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, a whale opened a leveraged long of 75,417.43 ETH at an average entry of 3,573 dollars and is showing an unrealized loss of 30.84 million dollars on a single address. Source: @ai_9684xtpa on X; DeBank profiles debank.com/profile/0x85e05c10db73499fbdecab0dfbb794a446feeec8, debank.com/profile/0xe5c248d8d3f3871bd0f68e9c4743459c43bb4e4c, debank.com/profile/0x6e9e81efcc4cbff68ed04c4a90aea33cb22c8c89 According to @ai_9684xtpa, 15 minutes before the post another address withdrew 16,937 ETH from Binance, approximately 53.91 million dollars, with the author suggesting it could be to lower the average entry price. Source: @ai_9684xtpa on X According to @ai_9684xtpa, across three addresses a total of 275,633.73 ETH has been pledged and 315 million dollars of stablecoins have been borrowed. Source: @ai_9684xtpa on X; DeBank profiles debank.com/profile/0x85e05c10db73499fbdecab0dfbb794a446feeec8, debank.com/profile/0xe5c248d8d3f3871bd0f68e9c4743459c43bb4e4c, debank.com/profile/0x6e9e81efcc4cbff68ed04c4a90aea33cb22c8c89 According to @ai_9684xtpa, the ownership of these addresses is unknown. Source: @ai_9684xtpa on X

According to @OnchainLens, whale address bc1qeax3s3ut2kaphz2wseruak5uslh6nmjz8stfhx withdrew 100 BTC worth $10.32M from Binance after two months of inactivity, source: @OnchainLens. According to @OnchainLens, the address now holds 300 BTC valued at $31M, with an unrealized loss of $2.4M, implying an average entry near $111.3k per BTC and an implied spot near $103.2k per BTC based on the reported valuations, source: @OnchainLens.

According to @lookonchain, Matrixport withdrew 872 BTC worth about 91.68 million dollars from Binance on Nov 11, 2025 (source: Lookonchain on X). The wallet attribution for this withdrawal references the Arkham Intelligence explorer entity page labeled bit-com that @lookonchain linked as evidence (source: Arkham Intelligence via Lookonchain).

According to @OnchainDataNerd, a fresh wallet 0x913 withdrew 668,000 ASTER (about $703,000) from Binance roughly two hours ago, based on the shared on-chain trace and address explorer link source: @OnchainDataNerd on X. According to @OnchainDataNerd, the same wallet amassed a total of 2,000,000 ASTER over three days at an average entry near $1.03, offering a concrete reference level for whale positioning analysis source: @OnchainDataNerd on X. According to @OnchainDataNerd, the reported $1.03 average and the 668,000-coin exchange outflow highlight a clear on-chain accumulation footprint that traders can track for liquidity and order flow reactions around that cost basis source: @OnchainDataNerd on X.

According to @EmberCN, an on-chain address collateralized approximately USD 700 million in USDC and borrowed 66,000 ETH (about USD 262 million) before transferring the ETH to Binance, indicating a short setup based on the transaction flow reported by the author (source: twitter.com/EmberCN/status/1985159041048588294; on-chain profile: debank.com/profile/0xe5c248d8d3f3871bd0f68e9c4743459c43bb4e4c). About 1.5 hours before the post, the address withdrew 20,021 ETH (about USD 78.15 million) from Binance, which the author interprets as buying back ETH to take profit after shorting (source: twitter.com/EmberCN/status/1985159041048588294). The author notes the short was initiated near ETH USD 4,032 and references ETH at USD 3,850, implying roughly USD 12 million profit on the covered portion (source: twitter.com/EmberCN/status/1985159041048588294). The author presents these flows as evidence of short-covering progress that could affect near-term ETH order flow around the USD 3,850 level (source: twitter.com/EmberCN/status/1985159041048588294).

According to @OnchainLens, a newly created wallet withdrew 280,907 LINK, worth about $5 million, from Binance to address 0x068A2d5c720FAA0D530F0dA7Fc9f30E139B65daB. According to @OnchainLens, this transfer represents a direct exchange outflow of 280,907 LINK from Binance.

According to @OnchainLens, a whale withdrew 15.115M DOGE valued at $2.95M from Binance after being dormant for 11 months, with the transaction tied to address 0xb41eea82cbd75cc8aa9446c65ef0e9979016b81b (source: @OnchainLens). @OnchainLens also reports the same wallet sold 7,473 DOGE for $1,450 USDT from an older holding, implying an execution price near $0.194 per DOGE based on the cited figures (source: @OnchainLens). @OnchainLens states the wallet currently holds 15.19M DOGE valued at $12.96M, and the reported transfer corresponds to at least a 15.115M DOGE outflow from Binance at the time of withdrawal (source: @OnchainLens).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, a new BSC wallet 0x165...46457 withdrew BNB from Gate and 600,000 USDT from Binance roughly 9 hours before the AT token’s planned 18:00 listing (source: @ai_9684xtpa; debot.ai address page). The author reports the token opened early, and at 17:52:59 the wallet deployed 600,000 USDT to buy about 3.258 million AT at an average cost of $0.18413 (source: @ai_9684xtpa; debot.ai address page). The wallet began selling at 17:53:31 and realized approximately $1.71 million in profit for a 284.2% return within about 30 minutes (source: @ai_9684xtpa; debot.ai address page).

According to @OnchainLens, a newly created wallet withdrew 250 BTC worth $30.8M from Binance on Oct 5, 2025, source: @OnchainLens. The destination address reported is bc1qejp44e66zfyj0chzz93cr6rs2pj5pwlegre5ra, source: @OnchainLens. Based on the reported figures, the implied BTC price is approximately $123,200 per BTC, source: @OnchainLens. No additional ownership or intent details were provided beyond the withdrawal amount, valuation, and address, source: @OnchainLens.

According to @EmberCN, whale address 0x1fc75ad0511ddc3a23b9583ba1c285b8292faed5 bought 21,597 ETH (~$87.86M) in the past hour at an average price of $4,068 during today’s ETH pullback. Source: @EmberCN on X; DeBank profile https://debank.com/profile/0x1fc75ad0511ddc3a23b9583ba1c285b8292faed5 The same address withdrew 2,400 ETH (~$10M) from Binance last night and redeemed roughly $87.86M in USDC, USDe, and USDf from Pendle to fund the spot purchases. Source: @EmberCN on X; DeBank profile https://debank.com/profile/0x1fc75ad0511ddc3a23b9583ba1c285b8292faed5 Over the last 15 hours, total ETH buys reached 23,997 ETH (~$96.36M) with a blended average of $4,078, providing a clear on-chain cost basis for traders to monitor. Source: @EmberCN on X; DeBank profile https://debank.com/profile/0x1fc75ad0511ddc3a23b9583ba1c285b8292faed5